Biblical Hermeneutics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professors, theologians, and those interested in exegetical analysis of biblical texts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have no skill at reading Hebrew, so I was using some tool to try and parse the sentence in Judges 4:4. I noticed that the definition given for the second word (אִשָּׁה) is "woman"; but what I'm unable to figure out is whether it is a modifier of some other word (like prophetess), or whether it stands on its own.

No major English translations seem to retain it as a separate word (i.e. "Deborah, a woman, a prophetess, the wife of Lappidoth, she was judging Israel at that time."), suggesting to me that the word is subsumed under "prophetess". However, it also seems from the lexicon that the word for "prophetess" already includes gender.

I realize that the grammars are very different; but are the English translations dropping something that is present in the Hebrew?

share|improve this question
Was this prompted by my earlier question on Deborah? – Jon Ericson Feb 13 '12 at 18:33
@JonEricson I read quite some time ago that the first 5-6 phrases in the Hebrew all identify Deborah as a woman, as if the author is going out of the way to point this out. Your question definitely prompted me to follow up on this and try and search it out for myself. – Soldarnal Feb 13 '12 at 20:52
up vote 12 down vote accepted

According the the NET Bible translator note on the verse:

1 tn Heb “ a woman, a prophetess.” In Hebrew idiom the generic “woman” sometimes precedes the more specific designation. See GKC 437-38 §135.b.

Interestingly, since her husband, Lappidoth, is identified the text must reorient itself to point back to Deborah when talking about her leadership role:

2 tn Heb “she was.” The pronoun refers back to the nominative absolute “Deborah.” Hebrew style sometimes employs such resumptive pronouns when lengthy qualifiers separate the subject from the verb.

The text goes out of its way to identify her as a woman in this verse by:

  • Giving her a feminine name (Dĕbowrah <01683>)
  • Calling her a prophetess (nĕbiy'ah <05031> is feminine)
  • Identifying her husband
  • And redirecting the subject to a woman when talking about her national role.

Finally, the translator mentions that her role could either be "leading Israel" or:

3 tn Or “judging.”


Having a woman in this role was no doubt unusual enough that the text seems to go out of its way to avoid confusion on that point.

share|improve this answer

There is no ambiguity about Deborah’s sex. The reason you have not seen a translation render this “Deborah, a woman, a prophetess, etc.” is the awkwardness of such a translation. And there are many other instances of this in the Bible: ish mitzri (to take an example from this morning’s Torah reading), “an Egyptian man” or just “an Egyptian”, not “a man, an Egyptian”. The Masoretic trop therefore explicitly combine the two words into a single phrase.

Note that the next instance of the word for woman in this verse is in the construct form and must be translated “woman of” (or “wife of”) and is attached to the next word. The usual translation is “wife of Lapidoth” and the midrash Eliyahu Rabbah identifies Lapidoth (meaning “torches”) with Barak (meaning “lightning”). However, in ArtScroll’s The Prophets, Rubin Edition, the words esheth lapidoth (אשת לפידות) are instead rendered “a fiery woman”. This seems to follow another midrashic tradition, as explained by Metzudath David ad loc. (translation my own):

Esheth lapidoth, that is to say, a woman of valor, enthusiastic in her service as a flaming torch; this is a colloquialism.

This translation is perhaps informed by the Midrash quoted in the Talmud (Megilla 14a):

אשת לפידות שהיתה עושה פתילות למקדש
She is called esheth lapidoth because she made wicks for the sanctuary.

If the text is read “a fiery woman” (lit., “woman of torches”), this Midrash would be a hyper-literal reading of her description. If the text refers to her husband, one might expect the Midrash to describe his fieriness instead.

share|improve this answer
Interesting. I see that Lapidoth comes from לַפִּיד (lappid or lappid) which means "torches". – Jon Ericson Feb 15 '12 at 17:23
@JonEricson, yes, exactly. – J. C. Salomon Feb 16 '12 at 20:24
Excellent answer. Thanks for updating. +1 from me :) – Dan Jan 9 '15 at 13:31

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.