Take the 2-minute tour ×
Biblical Hermeneutics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professors, theologians, and those interested in exegetical analysis of biblical texts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have pondered who wrote Hebrews for some time. In my studies, I have eliminated Paul for two reasons.

1) The style of Greek is different than the way Paul writes in his letters. It's a higher level of writing.

2) The emphasis of theology is different. For example, Paul always writes of Jesus' sacrifice being on Earth. Hebrews talks about Jesus' sacrifice from a heavenly standpoint (Hebrews 10).

Based on the writing, I began to wonder if it was Luke, as the Greek of Luke-Acts and Hebrews are so perfect. Then I read this verse this morning: "2:16 For assuredly He does not give help to angels, but He gives help to the descendant of Abraham." Luke, as a Gentile, never speaks of Christ's help as only to the sons of Abraham. In his genealogy of Christ, Luke goes past Abraham all the way back to Adam to show that salvation is available for all men.

Are there other indications in Hebrews that could tell us the writer?

share|improve this question
add comment

4 Answers

up vote 8 down vote accepted

(I wrote this in an essay on Hebrews a few years back, and this was also asked here)

Origen (185-254 CE) in the East has been quoted as saying that God only knows who wrote the Epistle although he also suggested that Paul was the author (Robertson, 1932). Hippolytus (170-236 CE) from Rome denied it was written by Paul. Tertullian (160-220 CE) in North Africa spoke of an Epistle of Barnabas to the Hebrews (Vincent, 1886). At the councils of Carthage (397& 419 CE) it was accepted that Hebrews was Pauline and was affirmed in the council of Trent (1545-1563) (Vincent, 1886). During the reformation doubt was again put on the authorship as Luther (1484-1546) said it was written by Apollos (Robertson, 1932) and Calvin (1509-1564) denied it was Pauline (Vincent, 1886). Adolf von Harnac (1851-1930) suggested that Priscilla may have been the author but Robertson (1932) highlights that Hebrews 11:32 mentions a masculine participle that dismisses this theory.

The Epistle itself provides some information about the author. The author was a friend of Timothy (13:23) and was possibly writing in Italy (13:24), although this verse may mean “those who are originally from Italy”. In Hebrews 2:3 the author includes himself in receiving the message of salvation from those who first heard it, thus making it likely the author was not an Apostle but a second generation convert (Achtemeier, Green, & Thompson, 2001, p. 467). Throughout Hebrews the author attributed all of the Scriptural quotes to God. This use of Scripture suggests that the author believed the Old Testament to be the inspired word of God. The author had knowledge of the Jewish system leading many to think that the author was Jewish. All copies of the Epistle that have been found were written in polished Greek and not in Hebrew, indicating that the author was educated (Achtemeier, Green, & Thompson, 2001, p. 469). The author also used the Greek Septuagint and not a Hebrew Old Testament to quote from, probably due to the large Hellenistic influence of the time.

Also (this wasn't in my essay) in 5:11, 6:9, 11 etc the author refers to themselves as "we" suggesting that Hebrews may have been co-authored, perhaps in the same way that Philippines and Philemon is written by Paul and Timothy (Phil 1:1, Philemon 1).

Citations

Achtemeier, P. J., Green, J. B., & Thompson, M. M. (2001). Introducing the New Testament: its literature and theology. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.

Robertson, A. T. (1932). Word pictures in the New Testament. Nashville: Broadman.

Vincent, M. R. (1886). Vicent word studies in the New Testament. Hendrickson Publishers.

share|improve this answer
    
If the Origen quote you refer to is the one in Lance's answer then it loses quite a lot by being taken out of it's context. –  Jack Douglas Feb 8 '12 at 17:56
1  
Hi Jack, I didn't have the direct Origen quote at hand, I was using what Robertson said (owww.studylight.org/com/rwp/view.cgi?bk=57&ch=0&vs=0-0] ): "Origen bluntly wrote: “Who wrote the Epistle God only knows certainly” as quoted by Eusebius. Origen held that the thoughts were Paul‘s while Clement of Rome or Luke may have written the book." The original quote from Lance is a good one and sheds way more light on what Origen thought than "God only knows, maybe Paul or Luke" –  Ampers Feb 8 '12 at 22:14
    
Interesting, thanks :-) –  Jack Douglas Feb 9 '12 at 4:14
add comment

Hebrews has long been associated with Paul, though, as you say, the Greek style and the focus are different.

The combination of literary Greek and knowledge of the Hebrew Scriptures indicates the author was probably a Greek-speaking Jew.

A few apostles and teachers mentioned in the book of Acts fit this profile:

  • Barnabas, a Levite from Cyprus (Acts 4:36)
  • Aquila, native of Pontus (Acts 18:2)
  • Priscilla, wife of Aquila, possibly a native of Rome
  • Apollos, an Alexandrian Jew (Acts 18:24)

Beyond that, it's hard to narrow down the authorship. We just don't have enough details to make anything more than an educated guess.

share|improve this answer
    
Matthew, Peter via Mark, Luke, John, Paul, James, Jude, the seven messengers to the seven churches. If the symbolism of Rev applies to the authorship of the NT, then it must have been Paul. –  Bob Jones May 17 '12 at 3:27
add comment

I like Origen's comment on the authorship of Hebrews:

But as for myself, if I were to state my own opinion, I should say that the thoughts are those of the apostle [Paul], but that the diction and phraseology are those of someone who wrote down at his leisure what had been said by his teacher. Therefore, if any church holds that this epistle is by Paul, let it be commended for this. For not without reason have the ancients handed it down as Paul’s. But who wrote the epistle, in truth, God knows.

I don't think you will find hard internal evidence for the authorship, but I think the classical view of the church, that Paul was the author, is the best external evidence.

A great article on it is here.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Internal Evidence is really hard to use to establish a claim for such a thing. It is too subjective and, as such, is most helpful for corroborating External Evidence.

The Greek in Hebrews is good - so Luke is a candidate. However, the content is decidedly Jewish, which Luke never really demonstrates as something about which he has tremendous grasp (throughout Luke-Acts). He tends to shy away from the Aramaic texts (outside of "amen") used in Mark, in particular throughout his writing in Luke-Acts.

Luke DOES demonstrate a tremendous understanding of the LXX, though.

I've always been more convinced by the argument for Apollos, personally.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.